October 16, 2016 – Original publish date
November 6, 2016 – Update
written by Net Advisor™
WASHINGTON, DC. It has been just over 15 years since the 9/11 (2001) terror attacks on the New York World Trade Center that killed 2,977 people (plus the 19 hijackers), and injured over 6,000 more. These events still have unanswered questions on who else was financing and supporting the airline hijackers?
Former President Bill Clinton admitted in 2014 that he could have killed the person who was reportedly behind the 9/11 terror attacks, Osama bin Laden (OBL), but didn’t. A September 12, 2016 Op-Ed in the Washington Post argued that ‘Bill Clinton’s terrorism strategy led to 9/11’ and Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy isn’t any different.
We know that Bin Laden was born to the family of billionaire Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden in Saudi Arabia. OBL was allegedly “banished” from the Saudi Kingdom in 1992, but he had already formed the Al-Qaeda (“The Base”) terrorist org in 1988. Bin Laden established a terror base in Afghanistan, declared war on the U.S., which lead up to the 9/11 (2001) attacks on America.
We also know that 15 of the 19 September 11, 2001 airline hijackers were citizens of Saudi Arabia, entered the USA on a “temporary visa, mostly tourist visas…one on a student Visa,” 14 of the 19 were living in Florida, all were males between the ages of 22 and 33, and all were Al-Qaeda affiliated.
We also know:
“At least one hijacker on each of the four planes in Tuesday’s terrorist attacks was trained at a U.S. flight school, the Justice Department says. Overall, 50 people may have been involved in the hijackers’ well-financed operation.
The FBI’s massive investigation stretches from the Canadian border to Florida, where some of the participants learned how to fly commercial planes before the attacks.”
— Source: USA Today, Sept. 13, 2001
The FBI suspected that over 50 people were involved in the 9/11 attacks. That leaves a lot of suspects out there which very little did the world hear about.
This is what happens when a government fails to properly screen people coming to the U.S., especially from nations that the U.S. knew of foreign governments either harbor, support, and or permit to exist anti-U.S. militant radicals.
[1] U.S. 9/11 Cover-up
Some 15 years since the 9/11 attacks, America discovered that the George W. Bush (2001-2009) and Barack Hussein Obama (2009-2017) Administrations allegedly had concealed the truth about who else was behind or associated with the 9/11 attacks on America.
In fact, the Saudi government threatened to sell U.S. assets if the U.S. Congress implicates them in the 9/11 attacks. Why would a country threaten economic retaliatory action if they had clean hands?
In a stunning TV News documentary, CBS 60 Minutes aired some of the missing information from the official 9/11 Commission Report (585 pps PDF). There are 28 (redacted) pages of documents that many say Saudi government employees had responsible ties to 9/11.
“A former Republican member of the 9/11 commission, breaking dramatically with the commission’s leaders, said Wednesday he believes there was clear evidence that Saudi government employees were part of a support network for the 9/11 hijackers.”
According to the Washington Times, the Saudi government is also accused of supporting ‘extremism’ in the United States at Mosques and charities.
The ’28 Pages’ however EXCLUDED the vetted conclusions of the 9/11 report which could implicate specific persons who had involvement in the 9/11 terror attacks.
Here are just a couple highlights of what was included in newly released ’28 pages’:
https://web.archive.org/web/20161204041011/https://twitter.com/Kia_Mak/status/754025901222920193
Despite what we know, the Obama Administration aggressively defended – the Saudi government, and NOT the 9/11 victims.
[2] Obama Admin Defends the Saudi Gov
The Obama Administration defended Saudi Arabia and claimed that there was “no evidence between Saudi government or senior Saudi individuals funded al-Qaida.”
We’ll, that isn’t the question is it?
The question is: Did anyone in the Saudi government, their associates, family, representatives, officials or the similar, have any ties, including but not limited to, support, financing, logistics, to any terrorism organization, including but not limited to the 9/11 hijackers?
Good luck if you are going to get an establishment president giving you a straight answer on that question.
The New York Post cited a July 2, 2002 CIA memorandum from the newly released 28 Pages that said this:
“A CIA memorandum dated July 2, 2002, stated unequivocally that the connections found between the hijackers, the Saudi embassy in Washington and Saudi consulate in Los Angeles are “incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists within the Saudi government.”
“Numerous” FBI files also fingered two Saudi government employees who assisted the 9/11 hijackers as “Saudi intelligence officers,” the newly declassified documents reveal.”
Given this knowledge has been around for over a decade and kept away from the American people, the Obama Administration was still more protective of the Saudi government then the 9/11 victim families.
President Obama actually issued a veto on a bill (S.2040) that would allow a legal case to be argued against the Saudi government on behalf of the 9/11 victim’s families. The lawyers for the 9/11 families still have to prove in a court of law that Saudi government officials or the similar were explicitly involved in 9/11. This bipartisan bill originally passed both the U.S. House and Senate. Yet, Pres. Obama didn’t want to even allow a legal argument to be heard.
[3] Congress Overrides Obama – Guess Who Didn’t Vote
Congress then managed to override President Obama’s veto:
“The House of Representatives voted 348-77 against the veto, hours after the Senate rejected it 97-1, meaning the “Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act” will become law.”
— Source: Reuters, Sept. 30, 2016
The ONLY Senator who voted AGAINST the bill was Democrat Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reid (Nevada). The other 77 ‘Nay’ votes were 18 “Republicans” and 59 Democrats.
The other two Senators who did NOT bother to vote for the 9/11 bill were oddly enough, former Democrat Presidential Candidate, Bernie Sanders (I-VT), and Hillary Clinton’s Vice Presidential Candidate, Tim Kaine (D-VA).
Now we know who is on the side to allow a court to hear an argument, and who would rather silence victims from ever being heard.
[4] Hillary Clinton Admits Saudi/ Qatar Gov’s Support Terrorism
Despite the White House 2016 denials of Saudi involvement in 9/11, a September 27, 2014 email released by Wikileaks uncovered that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton KNEW and ADMITTED that the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar are providing secret financial and other support to terrorists organizations including ISIL (ISIS).
Hillary Clinton Email Highlight:
The email clearly indicates that Hillary Clinton is keenly aware that the Saudi and Qatar government are secretly funding and supporting logistics for ISIL (ISIS) and other terrorist organizations. Would she be only person privy to this?
It is more than likely that the Obama Administration, and other key officials would also be well aware of this which could explain why President Obama visited Saudi Arabia for the fourth time.
Wikileaks also disclosed a 2016 private speech before Goldman Sachs. This speech by the former Secretary Hillary Clinton said Saudi Arabia is not exactly stable and that they would likely get nuclear weapons to “defend themselves.” She also said, this is “fraught with all kinds of problems.”
We are not sure why Hillary Clinton discussed national security issues with an investment bank who is also a big Clinton financial supporter? CNN stated that Hillary Clinton personally gave at least eight big bank (‘Wall Street’) speeches and raked in an average of $225,000 each or at least $1.8 Million. CNN did not discuss anything we have discussed here.
Clinton private speech to Goldman Sachs: Saudi is not stable and will get nuclear weapons https://t.co/qXA0hzytKg (see attachment) pic.twitter.com/JUkxNWoM6K
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 8, 2016
Hillary Clinton also said at this 2016 Goldman Sachs speech, “You Need to Have a Private and Public Position on Policy.”
In other words, you tell your big donors one thing (we’ll protect you, reward you), while telling the public that you are ‘tough on Wall Street’ and ‘tough on terrorism?’
[5] Whose Interest Do the Clinton’s Really Represent?
These are the questions we would encourage the American people to consider before the 2016 election.
How does one (HRC) be tough on someone (‘Wall Street’) who is funding your political campaign, paying you well over a million in dollars for ‘speeches,’ and funding millions more into your so called foundation?
How does one be tough on terrorism, while you (HRC) knowingly take in millions of dollars from governments that are financing and helping the terrorists?
This is like hiring an admitted child molester to babysit your kids, or hire a grossly intoxicated Uber driver to take you home from the freeway. A sane person would never do that, right? The correlation of Clinton’s personal knowledge of working with the “enemy” if you will is just stunning.
One has to ask, who’s side is Clinton on? Based on what we know so far, it certainly doesn’t look like Clinton is representing or defending America’s interest – and neither is her top aid.
[6] Clinton’s Top Aide Worked at Extremist Publication
Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin previously worked for an editorial board ran by her mother who push extremism.
“Chief-of-staff, Huma Abedin, worked on the editorial board of a Saudi-financed Islamic think tank alongside a Muslim extremist accused of financing al-Qaida fronts.”
— Sources: WND, July 25, 2012
Abedin (has or had?) apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood – a ‘ Sunni Islamist organization,’ and “as of 2015 is considered a terrorist organization” (Further reading).
Abedin worked for twelve years at the controversial publication, “Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs…under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief.”
This journal blamed America for the cause of 9/11.
The apparent influence of the Saudi government on the Bush and Obama Administrations have been great enough to omit terror groups from watch lists.
“The Saudi Arabian government apparently had so much clout with previous U.S. administrations that they refused to designate as terrorist organizations two terror…groups linked to Huma Abedin, now the vice-chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Abedin is joined at the hip to Hillary. She is to Mrs. Clinton what Valerie Jarrett (of Iran) is to President Obama.”
— Source: JihadWatch.org, June 23, 2016
We also learned this year that early on in the Obama Administration, reportedly ordered Homeland Security to ‘scrub records’ of those with terrorist ties.
#DHS 15yr Employee: Obama Admin Ordered Homeland Security to "SCRUB Records of Muslims with Terror Ties" https://t.co/gJcS2pmo7T #GOPDebate
— NetAdvisor.org® (@NetAdvisor) February 7, 2016
[7] Obama and Clinton Backed Muslim Brotherhood Extremist
In 2012, President Obama and Secretary Clinton backed the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s then President Mohamed Mursi who “was the first democratically elected head of state in Egyptian history.”
Morsi, a graduate from both Egyptian and California (USA) Universities, “issued a temporary constitutional declaration…that in effect granted him unlimited powers and the power to legislate without judicial oversight or review of his acts.”
Soon after this “Democratic-elected” tyrannical dictator self-claimed unlimited government power, the Egyptian people rose up and with the military’s help, deposed Morsi’s in a coup d’état. Morsi was originally sentenced to 20 years in prison, but now is serving a life sentence. Six of his associates received the death penalty in Egypt. I first wrote about corruption in Egyptian government in 2011.
Clearly the Obama Administration and Secretary Clinton had no insights to who they were supporting – or did they?
[8] Inside the Saudi Kingdom
Saudi Arabia has been having huge economic problems due to lower oil prices. This year the country was seeking to borrow another $6-8 Billion to ‘shore up its coffers.’
In 2015, the Kingdom ran a $100 Billion deficit. For a country that never had to really borrow money due to it’s high oil sales, now seems to be having issues.
Credit bond rating agency, Moody’s, downgraded Saudi’s credit rating in May 2016, along with Oman, and Bahrain.
The Saudi government operates mostly in ‘secret.’ The religious-driven government runs on strict Sharia law where some 25 percent of the population lives in poverty.
“The regime wants to keep everything secret….
A single family, the house of Saud, has ruled the country since its founding. They subscribe to a strict form of a Sunni branch of Islam, and the country is run according to Sharia law….
…Although the Saudi government has spent billions on social welfare, as much as a quarter of the population is estimated to live in poverty, a reality rarely seen.”
— Source: FRONTLINE / PBS (website transcript / PDF)(2016 video documentary)
When Americans needed help Hillary Clinton ignored their requests.
Both Bill and Hillary Clinton continue to defend Middle-eastern countries who as uncovered, are apparently involved in terrorism, criminalize those who are gay (LGBT), show little support for women’s rights, toppled a former terrorist dictator, and left women helpless as a result.
Yet, so long as some of those key countries keep sending money to the Clinton’s, they will continue to defend them and ignore the problems?
[9] Clinton Hush Money?
Since 9/11, the Clinton’s and their Clinton Foundation have received over $100 Million from Persian Gulf states.
“Bill and Hillary Clinton received at least $100 million from autocratic Persian Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic presidential candidate Hillary’s claim she can carry out independent Middle East policies.”
National security analyst Patrick Poole said:
“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension.”
— Daily Caller News Foundation, May 11, 2016 (website / PDF)
A June 2016 review of the Clinton Foundation website found disclosed donors in the $10 Million to $25 Million range included: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
In the $5 Million to $10 million donation range included the State (Government) of Kuwait, and Saudi billionaire, Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi.
In the $1 Million to $5 million donation range included large corporations and another Saudi billionaire, Nasser Ibrahim Al-Rashid.
WikiLeaks uncovered that the government of Qatar gave former President Bill Clinton a $1 Million birthday gift in exchange for a five minuet meeting with the former U.S. President.
“Qatar – Would like to see WJC (William Jefferson Clinton) ‘for five minutes’ in NYC (New York City), to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.”
— Source: Wikileaks (PDF)
Five minutes of your time for $1 Million? Surely the Qatar government expects no future consideration in return?
Hillary Clinton also said in a separate 2013 speech, that over the last 30 years, the Saudi’s have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on earth:
“…the Saudis have exported more extreme ideology than any other place on earth over the course of the last 30 years.”
— Hillary Clinton said at Jewish United Fund Advance & Major Gifts Dinner, 10/28/13 (PDF, P16)
[10] Review
The U.S. Government has apparently covered up some key facts behind the 9/11 (2001) terror attacks in New York that killed nearly 3,000 people, and injured another 6,000. This cover-up took place during BOTH the Bush and Obama Administrations.
Pres. Barack Obama has:
- Reportedly ordered Homeland Security to ‘scrub records of Muslims with terror ties.’
- Supported the Muslim Brotherhood, who later was finally deemed as a terrorist organization.
- Defends Saudi Arabia and insists there are no terror ties.
- Attempted to BLOCK Congress (via Veto) to PREVENT 9/11 victim families from having their voices heard in a court of law.
- Pres. Obama still refuses to say the worlds, “Radical Islamic Terrorism.“
Next,
Pres. William (Bill) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC):
- HRC also supported the Muslim Brotherhood, who later was finally deemed as a terrorist organization.
- HRC: The Saudi Gov has been exporting terrorism for over 30 years.
- HRC: The Saudi gov is currently supporting (including financing and logistics) ISIL (ISIS) and other terrorist organizations.
- HRC: The Saudi gov is unstable and may seek to obtain nuclear weapons.
- The Clinton’s have received as much as $25 Million or more from Saudi interests while knowing their involvement in supporting terrorism.
- HRC accepts money from countries that are Anti-LGBT, and Anti-women’s rights.
- HRC’s top aid has/had ties to a publication who pushes Islamic extremism, and blamed America for 9/11.
- HRC: Says she has a public and private policy viewpoints (and they seem to conflict).
- Bill Clinton received a $1 Million birthday gift from the government of Qatar where Hillary Clinton admitted is also supporting ISIL (ISIS), and other terror organizations.
- Even with their own admissions, the Clinton’s still defend their questionable foreign donations.
So in whose interests do the Clinton’s really represent?
Accepting Millions of dollars money from countries that the Clinton’s knowingly support terrorism, and continue to retain that money questions in whose interests do the Clinton’s represent?
The Story Behind the Haunting 9/11 Photo of a Man Falling From the Twin Towers (Time, 2016)
Credits: images by their respective owners as credited. Video: Time.
original content copyright © 2016 NetAdvisor.org® All Rights Reserved.
NetAdvisor.org® is a non-profit organization providing public education and analysis primarily on the U.S. financial markets, personal finance and analysis with a transparent look into U.S. public policy. We also perform and report on financial investigations to help protect the public interest. Read More.
